Binance Offers Another $400M to Traders After Crypto Crash Triggers Record Liquidations

by Main Desk
CE14-C

By CoinEpigraph Markets Desk • Oct 14, 2025 UTC

Following a weekend wipeout that set new marks for forced deleveraging, Binance said it will allocate an additional $400 million in relief to impacted users—framed as fee credits and other trading incentives tied to activity on the platform.

What’s new
Binance announced a fresh $400M pool aimed at traders affected by the latest market break. The exchange described the package as a mix of fee rebates, voucher credits, and targeted incentives for accounts that met internal criteria during the volatility window. Details on timing and eligibility were outlined in-app and via account notifications; the company said the program is additive to earlier measures rolled out after prior dislocations.

Why it matters
The weekend saw record liquidations across major venues as liquidity thinned and cascading stops magnified intraday swings. Relief initiatives don’t reverse forced unwinds, but they signal two priorities: (1) a push to keep active users funded and trading, and (2) a bid to stabilize market-making and spreads by reducing immediate frictions for the most active accounts. Incentives of this size also underline a broader industry reality: exchanges increasingly compete on post-shock retention, not only headline fees.

How this differs from insurance funds
Insurance funds are designed to backstop auto-deleveraging and cover shortfalls when counterparties can’t be matched. The new Binance allocation is separate: commercial credits that offset future trading costs or provide voucher value, rather than claims on a loss pool. In practice, that means users don’t receive “make-whole” payouts on past P&L; they receive forward-looking credits that reduce the cost of continued participation.

Microstructure angle
When a crash pushes implieds up and depth down, spreads widen and taker costs bite just as volatility invites activity. Fee credits compress the all-in cost of aggression and can make it easier for books to rebuild around best bid/offer. If maker rebates are part of the package, they can nudge quotes back toward the inside and shorten the time it takes for depth to normalize at ±1–2% from mid. None of this determines direction; it affects how smoothly the tape trades while participants re-enter.

Eligibility and strings
Programs like this typically segment users by:

  • Turnover during the event window (spot/perps)
  • Open interest and liquidation interactions
  • Historical activity tiers (VIP levels)
  • Compliance status/KYC (standard access requirement)

Credits often carry expiry dates, may be non-transferable, and can exclude certain products (for example, options vs. perps). Some prior programs on large venues have also tied top-tier credits to volume commitments over a short horizon.

Context and comparisons
Large relief packages have become more common after outsized moves. Exchanges frame them as goodwill plus market hygiene: preserving active books, cushioning re-entry costs, and signaling that platforms can absorb shock without resorting to sweeping trade busts. The optics cut both ways. Supporters view credits as pragmatic; critics see them as marketing spend that doesn’t address underlying leverage incentives. The lasting effect tends to show up in retained volumes, depth stability, and spread behavior during the next volatility patch.

Open questions

  • Scope & fairness: How granular are the eligibility rules, and will small accounts qualify in meaningful numbers?
  • Product coverage: Do credits apply to both spot and derivatives, and are options included?
  • Duration: How long will vouchers remain valid, and can they be stacked with existing VIP discounts?
  • Behavioral impact: Does the package help rebuild maker quotes where spreads widened most, or is it primarily a taker-side offset?

👉 “The CoinEpigraph Bottom Line”

The fresh $400M is a notable statement in the wake of record liquidations. It won’t reverse losses from forced unwinds, but it can lower the friction of returning to normal trading conditions and help books stabilize. The measure’s real test will be visible in the coming sessions: whether depth near the inside refills faster, spreads compress, and volumes normalize without a surge in reactive leverage.


At Coinepigraph, we pride ourselves on delivering cryptocurrency news with the utmost journalistic integrity and professionalism. Our dedicated team is committed to providing accurate, insightful, and unbiased reporting to keep you informed in the ever-evolving crypto landscape. Stay tuned as we expand our coverage to include new sections and thought-provoking op-eds, ensuring Coinepigraph remains your trusted source for all things crypto. -Ian Mayzberg Editor-in-Chief

The team at CoinEpigraph.com is committed to independent analysis and a clear view of the evolving digital asset order.
To help sustain our work and editorial independence, we would appreciate your support of any amount of Bitcoin/Satoshi to this address below: 3NM7AAdxxaJ7jUhZ2nyfgcheWkrquvCzRm
and through our Support Page.
🔍 Disclaimer: CoinEpigraph is for entertainment and information, not investment advice. Markets are volatile — always conduct your own research.

COINEPIGRAPH does not offer investment advice. Always conduct thorough research before making any market decisions regarding cryptocurrency or other asset classes. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future outcomes. All rights reserved 2024-2025.

Related Articles

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy