By CoinEpigraph Editorial Desk | October 27, 2025
The Illusion of Choice
BlackRock could run its tokenized ETFs or bond funds on Ethereum. Technically, nothing stops them.
But the world’s largest asset manager isn’t chasing decentralization—it’s calibrating control.
Governance and Liability
Ethereum is permissionless; anyone can transact, fork, or audit the code. That freedom collides with securities law.
Institutional tokenization demands the ability to freeze, whitelist, and reverse transactions.
In a compliance-first world, BlackRock can’t risk “code is law.” It needs law in the code—and only a private chain can guarantee it.
Regulatory Finality
On public blockchains, finality is cryptographic.
Regulators require legal finality—an accountable operator who can reverse errors or fraud.
Hence the preference for permissioned ledgers where every node is licensed and auditable.
Jurisdiction and Data Silos
GDPR and SEC record-keeping rules forbid scattering investor data across anonymous global nodes.
A closed network keeps all records on-shore, compliant, and controllable, satisfying both privacy law and audit trails.
Operational Predictability
Ethereum’s gas fees, congestion, and governance votes are volatile.
Institutions need deterministic block times, service-level guarantees, and change-control boards—features available only when you own the rails.
Strategic Leverage
Running a proprietary ledger converts the blockchain from infrastructure to moat.
Control the settlement layer, and you control who participates, at what cost, and under which terms.
That is the true dividend of private tokenization: programmable liquidity, not open liquidity.
CoinEpigraph View
Ethereum symbolizes democratized finance; BlackRock’s network represents codified hierarchy.
Both use distributed ledgers—but for opposite ends of the spectrum.
Public blockchains disperse power; private chains institutionalize it.
“Public chains liberated code. Private chains domesticate it.”
— CoinEpigraph Editorial Desk
At CoinEpigraph, we are committed to delivering digital-asset journalism with clarity, accuracy, and uncompromising integrity. Our editorial team works daily to provide readers with reliable, insight-driven coverage across an ever-shifting crypto and macro-financial landscape. As we continue to broaden our reporting and introduce new sections and in-depth op-eds, our mission remains unchanged: to be your trusted, authoritative source for the world of crypto and emerging finance.
— Ian Mayzberg, Editor-in-Chief
The team at CoinEpigraph.com is committed to independent analysis and a clear view of the evolving digital asset order.
To help sustain our work and editorial independence, we would appreciate your support of any amount of the tokens listed below. Support independent journalism:
BTC: 3NM7AAdxxaJ7jUhZ2nyfgcheWkrquvCzRm
SOL: HxeMhsyDvdv9dqEoBPpFtR46iVfbjrAicBDDjtEvJp7n
ETH: 0x3ab8bdce82439a73ca808a160ef94623275b5c0a
XRP: rLHzPsX6oXkzU2qL12kHCH8G8cnZv1rBJh TAG – 1068637374
SUI – 0xb21b61330caaa90dedc68b866c48abbf5c61b84644c45beea6a424b54f162d0c
and through our Support Page.
🔍 Disclaimer: CoinEpigraph is for entertainment and information, not investment advice. Markets are volatile — always conduct your own research.
COINEPIGRAPH does not offer investment advice. Always conduct thorough research before making any market decisions regarding cryptocurrency or other asset classes. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future outcomes. All rights reserved ™ © 2024-2028.
