PAPSS and the Architecture of a Unified African Payments System: How a New Settlement Rail Is Reducing Friction, Costs, and Dependency in Intra-Continental Trade

59

By CoinEpigraph Editorial Desk | December 10, 2025

For decades, intra-African commerce has carried a structural burden rarely acknowledged outside policy circles: the majority of payments between African countries have historically been routed outside the continent. A transaction between two neighboring nations often traveled through correspondent banks in Europe or North America before returning to its destination—introducing multi-day settlement delays, redundant compliance cycles, currency-conversion inefficiencies, and substantial fees.

This phenomenon was not merely an operational quirk.
It was a systemic limitation that shaped the character, volume, and cost of African trade.

Today, a new payment and settlement system—the Pan-African Payment & Settlement System (PAPSS)—is attempting to correct this long-standing constraint. While still early in its rollout, PAPSS represents one of the most ambitious efforts to unify regional financial infrastructure anywhere in the world. It is a project rooted not in geopolitics, but in payment architecture: the rails that allow commerce to move efficiently within a geographically vast and economically diverse region.

The emergence of PAPSS raises a deeper question:
Can a unified settlement rail materially transform the economics of intra-continental trade?

Early signals suggest the answer may be yes.

The Structural Problem PAPSS Was Designed to Solve

Intra-African trade has historically been shaped by several structural frictions:

1. Externalized settlement routes

Transactions between African banks often required intermediary corridors in London, New York, or Paris. This placed African commerce inside global FX cycles, correspondent-bank queues, and third-party compliance scrutiny.

2. Double conversions and currency mismatch risk

A payment from Ghana to Kenya, for example, might convert from cedi → USD → shilling, introducing:

• FX volatility exposure,
• additional conversion spreads,
• increased operational overhead,
• and higher transaction costs.

3. Fragmented regulatory and payments frameworks

Fifty-four nations, each with their own:

• banking standards,
• settlement regimes,
• currency controls,
• compliance expectations.

The result: settlement times often significantly lagged modern commerce.

4. Barriers for SMEs and regional-scale businesses

Large multinational corporations could absorb settlement inefficiencies.
Small and medium enterprises could not.

High cross-border friction was an invisible tax on regional entrepreneurship.

5. Liquidity leakage out of the continent

By routing settlements through foreign banks, African payment flows left the ecosystem temporarily, reducing:

• liquidity recycling
• capital efficiency
• FX stabilization capacity

PAPSS was designed to reverse these dynamics.

What PAPSS Actually Does: A Clean, Institutional Explanation

PAPSS is often described as “Africa’s cross-border payment system,” but this undersells its architecture. PAPSS is a multi-currency RTGS-like settlement engine, enabling:

• instant or near-instant settlement,
• direct bank-to-bank messaging,
• centralized clearing,
• netting of positions,
• and local-currency settlement for cross-border commerce.

Key features from a rail-architecture perspective:

1. Local-currency settlement

A merchant in Cameroon can receive CFA francs from a buyer in Egypt who pays in Egyptian pounds—without either party touching USD or euros.

This dismantles the double-conversion bottleneck.

2. Centralized settlement with unified rules

Banks and payment providers interact through PAPSS as a single shared infrastructure, not dozens of bilateral corridors.

3. Compliance harmonization

Standardized AML/CFT rules across members reduce duplicated compliance cycles and lower operational overhead.

4. Faster settlement

Transactions that once took days can finalize in seconds or minutes.

5. Liquidity optimization

Netting and centralized settlement reduce the liquidity requirements for smaller banks, broadening trade participation.

From a pure payments-architecture lens, PAPSS is to Africa what India’s UPI, Brazil’s Pix, and the EU’s SEPA were to their respective regions—an attempt to create an integrated financial operating layer.

Economic Rationale: Why a Unified Settlement Rail Matters

A payments system is not merely a technical layer.
It is a determinant of economic structure.

When settlement is expensive, fragmented, and slow, trade flows contract.
When settlement is faster, cheaper, and predictable, trade flows expand.

1. Lowering friction increases trade velocity

Economically, lower settlement latency reduces working-capital constraints.
Merchants turn inventory faster.
SMEs participate more easily.

2. Reducing FX dependency improves capital stability

Local-currency settlement:

• reduces exposure to USD volatility,
• strengthens domestic monetary sovereignty,
• and keeps liquidity circulating inside African banking systems.

3. Net settlement reduces regional liquidity constraints

Smaller financial institutions, historically excluded from cross-border activity due to liquidity requirements, gain operational-level access.

4. Payment interoperability supports regional scaling

Businesses can expand across borders without reengineering their payments stack for each new jurisdiction.

5. Data transparency improves regulatory capacity

Unified rails give central banks and supervisors:

• better visibility,
• cleaner analytics,
• and faster risk-identification mechanisms.

This is modernization at the rails—exactly the layer where meaningful efficiency gains arise.

A Comparison With Global Payment-Modernization Movements

Financial infrastructure modernization tends to follow a predictable sequence:

1. Fragmented cross-border payment rails
2. Regional standardization
3. Real-time domestic networks
4. Unified cross-border settlement
5. Optional programmable layers (future phase)

Africa is moving through stage 4.
Similar shifts include:

• SEPA in the Eurozone
• UPI + cross-border linkages in India
• PIX in Brazil
• PromptPay in Thailand
• FedNow in the United States (domestic only, but relevant)
• ISO 20022 alignment globally

PAPSS is not copying these models; it is responding to local needs.
But the structural logic is shared: regional integration requires rail integration.

Where PAPSS Could Become Transformational

PAPSS has not yet reached full continental adoption.
But its potential transformative effects include:

1. Making Africa a self-contained trade settlement zone

If PAPSS becomes ubiquitous across AfCFTA (African Continental Free Trade Area) participants, intra-African trade could settle without foreign dependency.

2. Lowering cost curves for logistics, manufacturing, and digital services

Payment friction is a hidden tax. Removing it reshapes multiple industries.

3. Improving financial inclusion at the enterprise level

More SMEs can enter cross-border commerce when operational friction shrinks.

4. Reducing currency volatility exposure

Local-currency settlement reduces the need for dollar liquidity in routine trade, easing pressure on African FX reserves.

5. Creating a foundation for programmable financial instruments

Once settlement rails unify, the region can later explore:

• real-time treasury rails
• programmable trade credit
• tokenized commercial invoices
• cross-border liquidity pools
• integrated compliance automation

These are long-horizon possibilities, not near-term deliverables—but all require unified settlement rails first.

PAPSS is step one.

Challenges and Realistic Constraints

A mature analysis must acknowledge constraints:

• Adoption must grow across all 54 nations.
• Some banks will need technical modernization.
• FX management across diverse currencies is non-trivial.
• Harmonizing regulatory expectations takes time.
• Trust in centralized systems must be earned.
• Liquidity-management models need continued refinement.

These challenges do not diminish PAPSS; they contextualize its stage of evolution.

Every infrastructure modernization—SEPA, SWIFT MX, UPI—faced similar early-phase hurdles.

The Broader View: Why the World Should Care

Africa is the fastest-growing region globally in population, mobile connectivity, and urbanization.
Trade infrastructure, not political narratives, will determine whether that growth becomes economic scale.

A unified payment rail:

• lowers barriers,
• increases capital efficiency,
• improves operational resilience,
• and creates conditions for modern digital economies.

The real significance of PAPSS is not that it is new.
The significance is that Africa now possesses a settlement rail capable of supporting the economic complexity of a continent-sized market.

In financial architecture, rails matter.
Rails shape flows.
Flows shape economies.

PAPSS is Africa’s attempt to redesign its rails.

Conclusion: A Structural Shift at the Foundation Layer

PAPSS is not a political project; it is an infrastructural one.
Its value lies in what it changes at the rails:
the cost, speed, and efficiency with which commerce moves.

By enabling local-currency settlement, reducing external dependency, harmonizing compliance, and accelerating payment finality, PAPSS provides a new settlement architecture for the continent.

If adoption accelerates, the long-term effect could be a reshaping of intra-continental trade dynamics—one driven not by rhetoric, but by rails.

In the history of global finance, economic transformation often follows infrastructure.
PAPSS may be the first step toward a more integrated African financial operating layer.

This makes it not only a regional milestone, but an important case study for anyone examining the future of payment modernization globally.

---

At CoinEpigraph, we are committed to delivering digital-asset journalism with clarity, accuracy, and uncompromising integrity. Our editorial team works daily to provide readers with reliable, insight-driven coverage across an ever-shifting crypto and macro-financial landscape. As we continue to broaden our reporting and introduce new sections and in-depth op-eds, our mission remains unchanged: to be your trusted, authoritative source for the world of crypto and emerging finance.
— Ian Mayzberg, Editor-in-Chief

COINEPIGRAPH does not offer investment advice. Always conduct thorough research before making any market decisions regarding cryptocurrency or other asset classes. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future outcomes. All rights reserved ™ © 2024-2028.